Most legal AI is a chat window bolted onto a general cloud model: confident, fluent, and occasionally inventing a fact you’ll only catch on cross. Every RITA report is built on the rule above instead. This page is how.
Conclusions drawn from the record, not a summary or a search.
Every finding is cited back to its exact page in the record.
Abstains — "not in the record" — instead of guessing.
Deviation of care measured against the standards you upload.
Billing analysis computed from the charge lines, not estimated.
RITA runs locally, so your case files never leave a network you control.
If it's not documented, she says so — instead of guessing.
The engineering built to earn the candor on the front page, not just claim it.
Multi-Domain Governed Reasoning Architecture — the layer every RITA report is powered by, holding her reasoning accountable to the record across every report domain, not just the one she's currently writing.
Proprietary architecture. Every stated finding has to resolve to an exact source in the file — a claim with nowhere to point doesn't get made.
The same governed reasoning, packaged to travel — de-identified and citation-grounded before it ever reaches a cloud assistant.
Verified on the Jordan Avery case file — one synthetic record, checked the same way a real one would be.